License renewals challenged (Chicago Sun-Times, November 3, 2005)

Posted by Mitchell - November 3, 2005 (entry 377)

License renewals challenged by Robert Feder, Chicago Sun-Times -- November 3, 2005

Objecting to what it calls inadequate coverage of politics on local television, a media reform group is challenging the license renewals of nine stations in Chicago.

Chicago Media Action petitioned the Federal Communications Commission this week to deny renewals for WBBM-Channel 2, WMAQ-Channel 5, WLS-Channel 7, WGN-Channel 9, WCIU-Channel 26, WFLD-Channel 32, WCPX-Channel 38, WSNS-Channel 44 and WPWR-Channel 50. All were cited for deficient coverage of 2004 elections.

"The FCC has repeatedly affirmed the importance of broadcasters' service to the local community," said Andrew Jay Schwartzman of the Washington-based Media Access Project, which is backing the Chicago group. "It's impossible to reconcile this emphasis on localism with the paucity of local election coverage available to Chicago voters."

In a separate action, a Chicago group called Third Coast Press also filed challenges to the license renewals of all the commercial stations as well as public stations WTTW-Channel 11 and WYCC-Channel 20. That complaint claims the stations "marginalized voices of anti-war activists in the lead-up to the invasion of Iraq."

All television station licenses in Illinois are up for renewal this fall. After hearings, licenses may be granted for eight years.

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action as an organization.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.