Low Power FM Radio Supporters Praise FCC LPFM Action

Posted by Mitchell - March 18, 2005 (entry 290)

Release: Friday, March 18th

Contacts: Pete Tridish or Hannah Sassaman Prometheus Radio Project, 215.727.9620, petri@prometheusradio.org, hannah@prometheusradio.org Harold Feld, Media Access Project, 202.232.4300, hfeld@mediaaccess.org Gloria Tristani, Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, (202) 263-2586, tristang@ucc.org



Low power FM (LPFM) broadcasters and supporters praised the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) for beginning a new proceeding to promote LPFM. On February 8, 2005, the FCC held a public forum to hear from LPFM broadcasters. In addition to presenting numerous success stories, LPFM advocates explained how existing FCC rules hindered the development of the LPFM service. In response, departing FCC Chairman Michael Powell promised to move "as soon as possible" to address issues raised by the LPFM community. Supporters praised Powell for finishing the item before leaving and avoiding any delay the change in Chairmanship might cause.

"We thank everyone involved in the process, particularly Chairman Powell, for keeping their promise to work with the LPFM community," said Pete Tridish, founder of the Prometheus Radio Project. "LPFM provides unique local programming in hundreds of communities around the country. This gives us the opportunity to fix a number of problems that have come up since the FCC authorized the service five years ago." In 1999 and 2000, the Prometheus Radio Project worked with the FCC to get the FCC to approve LPFM radio -- radio stations that broadcast at 100 watts or less, and that are licensed to community groups, churches, and schools. Prometheus Radio serves as a resource for LPFM broadcasters and would-be broadcasters.

Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ (UCC) Managing Director Gloria Tristani stated: "we are very grateful to all the FCC Commissioners who voted unanimously for this order that will expand opportunities for LPFM radio service. The UCC has strongly advocated for this service from the beginning because it empowers people in their local communities."

A chief concern for LPFM supporters is the proliferation of FM translators. FM Translators and LPFM stations compete for the same spaces on the radio dial. But while LPFM stations provide locally generated programming, translators only repeat signals from distant full power stations or from a satellite feed. Right now, the rules favor whoever gets in first.

In 2000, in response to lobbying from the National Association of Broadcasters, Congress cut back the number of channels available to LPFMs from several thousand to only a few hundred, and required the FCC to do further study to determine if the original rules would create interference for existing full power broadcasters. In 2003, the FCC released a study showing that restoring the lost channels would cause no interference to full power broadcasters. Congress is now considering legislation to restore the lost channels.

But the FCC has thousands of pending applications for new translators. If the FCC grants the translator applications, there will be no space for new LPFMs if Congress passes the pending legislation. Today's action puts in place a temporary freeze on processing translator applications while the FCC considers what to do. LPFM advocates want LPFM stations given priority over translators.

"If it's a choice between a local LPFM providing local programming and a translator bringing in a signal from hundreds of miles away, the local programming should win," said Harold Feld, a lawyer from the Media Access Project (MAP). MAP, a non-profit public interest law firm, represents Prometheus at the FCC. Last week, on behalf of Prometheus and others, MAP asked the FCC to investigate whether three individuals who applied for over 4,000 translator licenses violated federal law by selling some of their free licenses for more than $800,000. The three individuals used "dummy" companies based in Twin Falls, ID to disguise their conduct from the FCC. Monday, an attorney for the companies filed a motion denying wrongdoing and asking the FCC to dismiss the request for an investigation. MAP opposed the motion. The request remains pending, unaffected by today's FCC action.

DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this website are those of the individual members of Chicago Media Action who authored them, and not necessarily those of the entire membership of Chicago Media Action, nor of Chicago Media Action as an organization.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.